Fearon v. Fodera
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. J. Mazza, and Lilienthal, McKinstry & Raymond, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
A hearing of the above-entitled cause was ordered before this court. After due consideration, we are satisfied with the opinion and decision of the court of appeal for the first district, by Presiding Justice Lennon, which is hereby adopted and made the decision of this court. It is as follows:
“In this action the plaintiff sought and recovered a judgment quieting his title to certain lands in the county of Fresno, and awarding him damages as well against certain of the defendants for what in law is known as ‘ slander of title. ’ The complaint in effect charged that the defendants…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Burkett v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Coley v. HeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Landstrom v. ThorpeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- Central Montana Stockyards v. FraserMontana Supreme Court · 1957
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.