Legal Opinion
Hansbrough v. D. W. Standrod & Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided April 5, 1930No. 5147PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRINCK, District Judge.
The respondent is a practicing attorney at law who, in November, 1921, was employed by D. W. Standrod & Company, a banking institution, to bring a suit against a firm known as Swauger Brothers and others. After the suit was commenced a settlement was made between the plaintiff and defendants therein, whereby the bank received certain notes of the defendants and, as collateral security for their payment, received 81,999 shares of the capital stock of Swauger Land & Livestock Company, a corporation. Upon learning of the settlement, respondent obtained an agreement from…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Peri v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Coleman v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Pettengill v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- McJunkin v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- McCaffey C. Co., Inc. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Church v. RoemerIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Taylor v. S & M Lamp Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Renfro v. NixonIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.