Legal Opinion

Renfro v. Nixon

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1935No. 6192PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, C. J.

F. M. Bistline, Esquire, an attorney of this court, as attorney for appellant Renfro in proceedings before the Industrial Accident Board, secured an award for $177.70 against appellant’s employer, respondent Nixon; for which sum judgment, reciting that Bistline was attorney for Renfro, was regularly docketed as provided for by I. C. A., sec. 7-1108, April 1, 1930. Thereafter, and without Bistline’s knowledge or consent, the judgment was paid by Nixon direct to Renfro, and satisfaction entered April 24, 1930. About October 19, 1932, Bistline moved to set aside such satisfaction of judgment to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cohen v. GoldbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Weed Sewing Machine Co. v. BoutelleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884
  3. Leask v. HoaglandNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  4. In re WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
  5. Taylor v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Skelton v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Frazee v. FrazeeIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Dowd v. Estate of DowdIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In Interest of DunmireIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API