Legal Opinion

Loth v. Loth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 7, 1949No. 34,778PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff was granted a divorce. Defendant appeals. On the appeal no questions are raised with respect to the propriety of granting the divorce. Defendant’s only contention is that the alimony and allowances awarded are excessive.

Defendant’s contention that the alimony and allowances awarded to plaintiff are excessive raises the following questions: (1) Whether upon conflicting evidence a finding is justified that defendant made a gift to plaintiff of the excess of money deposited in bank accounts as joint tenants over and above amounts expended by her to maintain their…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Burnet v. HoustonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Virginia v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Burnet v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Brinkerhoff-Farris Trust & Savings Co. v. Home Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Midway Center Associates v. Midway Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Boulevard Plaza Corp. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Kucera v. KuceraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API