Legal Opinion

Skamania County v. Woodall

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 26, 2001No. 25204-0-IIPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

16 P.3d 701 (2001)

104 Wash.App. 525

SKAMANIA COUNTY, Appellant,

v.

Chris WOODALL, Respondent, and

Columbia River Gorge Commission, Intervenor-Respondent.

No. 25204-0-II.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

January 26, 2001.

Bradley W. Andersen, Skamania County Pros. Office, Stevenson, for Appellant.

Jonathon Aurel Gurish, Asst. Atty. Gen., Olympia, Gary Keith Kahn, Reeves, Kahn & Eder, Portland, OR, for Respondents.

HOUGHTON, J.

The Skamania County Board of Adjustment ruled that Washington law requires a person seeking to prove a land occupier has discontinued a nonconforming use to prove that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Holloway v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Mendez v. Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. Condon v. CondonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Warner v. Design & Build Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Edmonds Shopping Center Associates v. City of EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. McMILIAN v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API