Legal Opinion

Condon v. Condon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 2013No. 86130-7PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, C.J.

¶1 In open court, appellant Vanessa Condon1 and respondent Fely Condon entered into a stipulated settlement and dismissal with prejudice of Vanessa’s claims against Fely, stemming from an automobile accident. Before payment of the settlement funds, Fely requested that Vanessa sign a release agreement, which the parties had not discussed or placed on the record. Vanessa refused to sign the release, and Fely made a motion to enforce the settlement and the release. The trial court entered an order deeming the release signed. Vanessa filed a motion for discretionary review in this court,2 arguing…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Infinite Security Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties II, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Columbia Legal Services v. Stemilt Ag Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  3. Cruz v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Kilcullen v. Calbom & Schwab, PSCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. Amana Global Company v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API