Legal Opinion
Edmonds Shopping Center Associates v. City of Edmonds
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 23, 2003No. 50815-6-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cox, A.C.J.
Edmonds Shopping Center Associates, MBPH, Inc. d/b/a Marty’s Public House, and Albert Dykes and Margaret Ryan-Dykes (collectively Dykes) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment substantially in favor of the city of Edmonds concerning its adoption of Ordinance 3328. The ordinance prohibits cardrooms and addresses other issues that we describe later in this opinion.
We hold that section 1 of the ordinance is a proper exercise of the police power of the city. Moreover, state law preempts the field of the other activities that the ordinance purports to affect. The city’s…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. GunwallWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Rousso v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Rousso v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Des Moines v. Gray Businesses, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Paradise, Inc. v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.