Warner v. Design & Build Homes, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 —After Curtis and Ana Warner discovered structural defects and significant mold growth in their new home, they sued Design and Build Homes, Inc., (Design) and Omega Pacific Lath & Plaster, Inc., (Omega). The Warners asserted that Design, as the builder-vendor, had breached the implied warranty of habitability. As to Omega, the subcontractor, the Warners maintained that they were third-party beneficiaries under the contract between Omega and Design, which therefore entitled them to bring a claim for breach of an implied warranty of workmanlike construction. The trial court granted Design…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Del Guzzi Constr. Co. v. Global Northwest Ltd., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
- Stuart v. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Eastlake Construction Co. v. HessWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Thomson v. Espey Huston & Associates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Hartley v. BallouSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Jocelyn Allen v. the Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jocelyn Allen v. Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Dutchmen Manufacturing, Inc. v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Kim v. MoffettCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- West v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.