Haab v. County of Maricopa
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSEN, Judge.
¶ 1 In this opinion we address whether a timely notice of claim pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-821.01 (2003) that alleges one set of wrongs by a public entity or employee provides notice, pursuant to the statute, of subsequent related but different wrongs by the same entity or employee. We hold that in such a situation, because the original claim does not describe the second set of alleged acts, it does not comply with the statute, and the claimant must amend his notice or file a new notice in order to preserve claims based on the second set…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Eller Media Co. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vasquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Canyon Del Rio Investors, L.L.C. v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Turner v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Slaughter v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.