Legal Opinion

Haab v. County of Maricopa

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 5, 2008No. 1 CA-CV 07-0562PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 In this opinion we address whether a timely notice of claim pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-821.01 (2003) that alleges one set of wrongs by a public entity or employee provides notice, pursuant to the statute, of subsequent related but different wrongs by the same entity or employee. We hold that in such a situation, because the original claim does not describe the second set of alleged acts, it does not comply with the statute, and the claimant must amend his notice or file a new notice in order to preserve claims based on the second set…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Eller Media Co. v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Phoenix Baptist Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. AikenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Canyon Del Rio Investors, L.L.C. v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Turner v. City of FlagstaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Slaughter v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API