Legal Opinion

Turner v. City of Flagstaff

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 3, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0172PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSEN, Judge.

¶ 1 Paul Turner appeals from the dismissal of his suit under the Arizona Private Property Rights Protection Act for failure to file a proper pre-litigation notice of claim. We agree with the superior court that Turner’s notice of claim was defective because it failed to identify the owner of the property at issue. We remand to allow the court to consider whether Turner may cure the notice by amending it.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 With certain exceptions not relevant here, the Arizona Private Property Rights Protection Act allows a private owner of real property to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fields v. OatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Pinal Cnty. v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. James Ellexander Mitchell v. State of ArizonaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026
  4. McCcd v. Hon talamante/arvizuCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Waller v. Nogales, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API