Legal Opinion

Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa County

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 2006No. CV-06-0106-PRPublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Before suing a public entity for damages, a plaintiff must file a notice of claim “with the person or persons authorized to accept service for the public entity ... as set forth in the Arizona rules of civil procedure within one hundred eighty days after the cause of action accrues.” Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 12-821.01(A) (2003). If the public entity is a county, the persons authorized to accept service under Arizona Rule of Civil Procedure 4.1(i) are either “the chief executive officer, the secretary, clerk, or recording officer thereof.”

¶ 2 This case requires us…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Martineau v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Nielson v. PattersonArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Salerno v. EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. Maricopa County v. Arizona Tax CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Blauvelt v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Backus v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Harris v. Cochise Health SystemsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. City of Phoenix v. FieldsArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Simon v. MARICOPA MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API