Legal Opinion

Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Apache County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 8, 2001No. 1 CA-TX 00-0002PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 In 1996, Arizona voters passed Proposition 101, which added Article 9, Section 2(6) to the Arizona Constitution. That provision allows the legislature to exempt from taxation a maximum of $50,000 of the full cash value of “personal property of a taxpayer” that is used for agricultural, trade, or business purposes. At the time it referred Proposition 101 to the electorate, the legislature conditionally enacted former Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated (“A.R.S.”) section 42-280 (Supp.1998), which granted the above-described exemption for “each taxpayer.”

¶ 2 Appellants…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Prince v. City of Apache JunctionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Heath v. KigerArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. RiosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Montgomery v. MathisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API