Legal Opinion

State v. Oaks

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 14, 2005No. 2 CA-CR 2002-0386PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 A jury found appellant Derek Oaks guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and aggravated assault causing serious physical injury, both dangerous nature offenses. The trial court sentenced Oaks to partially aggravated, concurrent, ten-year terms of imprisonment. He contends on appeal that the court erred by refusing to give his requested jury instruction on recklessness and by relying on improper factors to aggravate his sentences. In a supplemental brief, Oaks asserts he was entitled to have a jury determine the existence of aggravating factors…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. DavoltArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. State v. HassonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Robbins v. DarrowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API