Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court of San Luis Obispo Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1997No. B107385PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 170.65 subdivision (a), enacted in 1995, and recodified in 1996 provides: “A retired judge shall not hear and try any criminal cause when it is stipulated jointly by the prosecuting attorney and the defendant and his or her counsel, and submitted to the court as hereinafter provided, that the retired judge is not capable or qualified to hear and try the criminal cause.” This statute has a “sunset” provision, i.e., it “shall remain in effect until January 1, 2001, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Obrien v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. ArmogedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Independent Roofing Contractors v. California Apprenticeship CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Gilbert v. John Chiang, as State Controller, etc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API