Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Armogeda

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 2015No. G048761PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

IKOLA, J.

— In 2000, the California voters passed Proposition 36 for the purpose of placing nonviolent drug offenders into substance abuse treatment programs, rather than incarcerating them. (Prop. 36, as approved by voters, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 7, 2000) § 3.) Among its provisions, Proposition 36 enacted Penal Code section 3063.1, which, under many circumstances, prohibits the Board of Parole Hearings from revoking parole and incarcerating the parolee based on his or her commission of a nonviolent drug possession crime or violation of a drug-related parole condition. (For convenience, any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lockyer v. Shamrock Foods Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Amwest Surety Insurance v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. In Re WaltersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Proposition 103 Enforcement Project v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. MoralesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. DouglasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. People v. Steward, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. People v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API