Legal Opinion

Obrien v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2000No. S085212PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Jerome Berg, in pro. per., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.—

From the creation of the State Bar Court in 1988 until the present, Business and Professions Code sections 6079.1, subdivision (a), and 6086.65, subdivision (a), have provided that this court appoints all judges of the State Bar Court. Revised versions of these statutes, operative November 1, 2000, provide that of the five judges of the State Bar Court Hearing Department (hereafter Hearing Department), two judges shall be appointed by this court, one by the Governor, one by the Senate Committee on Rules, and one by the Speaker of the Assembly. The revised statutes further…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State ex rel. Hovey v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Superior Court v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Oasis West Realty v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Le Francois v. GoelCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. People v. BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API