Legal Opinion
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 30, 1986No. 22-HPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
On April 21, 1986, defendant filed a motion in limine for an order precluding admission into evidence of plaintiff White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona’s (“plaintiff’s”) expert witness report on damages.
A motion in limine is a recognized method under RUSCC 16 and Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 for obtaining a pretrial order simplifying issues for trial, including the exclusion of irrelevant evidence on the ground that it is offered to prove a legally deficient claim. Baskett v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 356, 359-60, 367-68 (1983) (motion in limine), aff'd mem., 790 F.2d 93…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cappaert v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Weeks Dredging & Contracting, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Cencast Services, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Northern Paiute Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.