Legal Opinion

Northern Paiute Nation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 8, 1986No. 87-APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

In this Indian claims case, plaintiff, the Walker River Tribe (the Tribe), seeks damages to compensate it for losses resulting from the non-irrigation of certain allotted irrigable land. Plaintiff attributes the loss to the government’s failure to perform an obligation to provide the Tribe with water.1 The sole issue presently before the court is whether there exists subject matter jurisdiction in the court to decide the claim presented by the Tribe.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment, contending that the claim is an aggregation of individual Indian claims rather than…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa v. CumminsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023
  3. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. UTE Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
  5. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API