Legal Opinion

Energy Capital Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 22, 2000No. 97-293 CPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

DAMICH, Judge.

The central issue in this case is the difficult question of whether lost profits of a new venture may be obtained from the United States in a breach-of-contract case. In the Court’s view, precedent does not preclude, as a matter of law, this Court from awarding lost profits when the Plaintiff was involved in a new venture, and it does not preclude awarding lost profits in the context of a new venture, when the Defendant is the United States. True, lost profits are rarely awarded against the United States. “Rarely,” however, is not the same as “never.” The Court…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Hercules, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1916

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Energy Capital Corp. (As General Partner of Energy Capital Partners Limited Partnership) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Franconia Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Westfed Holdings, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  4. Drysdale v. WoerthDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Coast Federal Bank, FSB v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API