Strong v. Shatto
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Grant Jackson, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.
This action was brought to quiet title as against certain conditions subsequent contained in a deed through which plaintiff’s title is deraigned.
Without setting forth the conditions in extenso, it is sufficient for the discussion of the issues presented on this ap peal to state that they limit the use of the premises to residence purposes only, prescribe the nature, quality, and cost of buildings to be erected thereon, and provide that “as to the grantor herein, the breach of any of the foregoing conditions shall cause said premises together with the appurtenances to be forfeited to and to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hopkins v. GrimshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- First Universalist Society of North Adams v. BolandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Landell v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Evans v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Firth v. MarovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Hurd v. AlbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Marra v. Aetna Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- McCray v. Citizens Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.