Lumpkins-Benford v. Allstate Insurance
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Ruben Castillo, Chief Judge
Plaintiff Ann Lumpkins-Benford, proceeding pro se,1 brings this suit against Defendant Allstate Insurance Company, alleging employment discrimination on the *812bases of race and sex and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Presently before the Court are Defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Defendant’s motion to strike some of Plaintiffs statements of fact. For the reasons set forth below,…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Inst.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Perez v. WallisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014
- Essendant Co. v. American Product Distributors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Porter v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023
- Walden v. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018