Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Greenler

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1959No. 34858PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This action was brought by the respondent, William Taylor, under RCW 8.24, to condemn a private way of necessity across the land of the appellants, Francis and Zola Greenler. An order adjudicating necessity was filed on June 28, 1957. The case thereafter came on for trial for the assessment of damages, and there was a verdict in favor of the appellants in the sum of three hundred and seventy dollars, which, together with costs, was paid into the registry of the court by the respondent on May 16, 1958.

From the judgment on the verdict, signed May 16 and filed May 19, 1958, the appellants gave…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Public Utility District No. 1 v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Reed v. Spanaway Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co. v. SlosserWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Long v. BillingsWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State Ex Rel. Northwestern Electric Co v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Taylor v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. ThoenyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. ThoenyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Hennessey Funeral Home, Inc. v. DeanWashington Supreme Court · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API