Legal Opinion

Long v. Billings

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1893No. 994PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Thurston Country.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

An application tó a court for the designation of a way of necessity, as a common law right, would be an equitable proceeding, and on an appeal in such a case, taken in April, 1893, the entire record must have been brought up, as in other equity cases. But the matter before us is not such an application, but rather a special proceeding to appropriate a ‘.‘private way of necessity” as the term is used in the constitution; in other words, it is a condemnation proceeding. In such cases no more of the record need be brought up than in ordinary…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Tacoma v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burg v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Healy Lumber Co. v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gasaway v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Grays Harbor Boom Co. v. LownsdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API