Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1964No. 36797PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

In 1940, plaintiff (appellant) purchased a tract of land in Mason County. The property was not served by electricity. When plaintiff applied to defendant (respondent), Puget Sound Power & Light Company, for the installation of electrical service, he was told that an easement would have to be acquired over the property located between his land and the closest power line. At that time the intervening property was occupied by Mr. Small-wood. Subsequently, it was acquired by Mr. Greenler.

Plaintiff paid $10 to defendant and received a “Receipt for Service Line Cost,” dated June 17, 1940. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lindquist v. MullenWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Cornell v. EdsenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Taylor v. GreenlerWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Safeco Insurance Co. v. BarcomWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Brown v. EllisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Architechtonics Construction Management, Inc. v. KhorramCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API