Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Reed v. Spanaway Water District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1951No. 31561PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

— Plaintiffs below sought by mandamus to compel dissolution of Spanaway water district by the commissioners thereof, pursuant to the provisions of Rem. Rev. Stat., § 11602 [P.P.C. § 994-51] (Laws of 1929, chapter 114, § 25, p. 244). The demurrer of defendant commissioners to the application for the writ of mandamus was sustained. Plaintiffs elected to stand on the demurrer. They have appealed from the order of the trial court dismissing their application for the writ.

The basic question in this appeal is whether Rem. Supp. 1941, § 8931-11 et seq. (Laws of 1941, chapter 87, § 1, p. 211),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Abel v. Diking & Drainage Improvement District No. 4Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. State Ex Rel. Spokane & Eastern Branch of Seattle First National Bank v. Justice Court for Spokane PrecinctWashington Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Tardiff v. Shoreline School DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re Estate of WiltermoodWashington Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. EnsmingerWashington Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API