Legal Opinion
Olympic Pipe Line Co. v. Thoeny
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 23, 2004No. 31613-7-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
101 P.3d 430 (2004)
124 Wash.App. 381
OLYMPIC PIPE LINE COMPANY, Respondent,
v.
George and Peggy THOENY, Appellants.
No. 31613-7-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
November 23, 2004.
Mark Robert Johnsen, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
Steven B. Tubbs, Attorney at Law, Vancouver, WA, for Appellant.
QUINN-BRINTNALL, C.J.
Property owners appeal a superior court order condemning a portion of their property in favor of Olympic Pipe Line Company under RCW 81.88.020 and chapter 8.20 RCW. They contend that the trial court erred in denying their motion to dismiss Olympic's action…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Smith v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Bodin v. City of StanwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Sanders v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Marshall v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Badgley Mullins Turner, Pllc App./x-resp. v. Leslie Spencer & Tammy S., Blakey, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- CITY OF PUYALLUP v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- City of Puyallup v. HoganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.