Legal Opinion

Washington Perfection Co. v. Davin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1926No. 19584. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action on a written agreement, signed by the defendant, to recover a sum of money which was owing it by the Davin-Horn Company, a corporation, and which it claimed the defendant had agreed to pay. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact, conclusions of law and a judgment sustaining a recovery in the sum of $526.56 together with interest, attorneys’ fee and costs. From this judgment, the defendant appeals.

The Davin-Hom Company was a corporation, organized and existing under the laws of this state, with its principal place of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Corkrell v. PoeWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Gilmore v. Skookum Box FactoryWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Horstmann Co. v. WatermanWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Schoemer v. ZeranWashington Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Priestley v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Pacific Mercantile Agency, Inc. v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Western Seafood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. National Association of Creditors v. MenishWashington Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API