Legal Opinion
Pacific Mercantile Agency, Inc. v. First National Bank
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 8, 1936No. 26117. Department TwoPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The plaintiff, as assignee for collection, brought this action to recover the balance claimed to be due on a contract to pay for building materials, to which the assignor was not a party. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plain tiff was not entitled to recover. From the judgment entered dismissing* the action, the plaintiff appeals.
The facts are these: The respondent is a banking corporation authorized to transact business in this state, with its principal place of business at Ferndale, in "Whatcom county. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Finkelberg v. Continental Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Sayward v. Dexter, Horton & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1896
- Horstmann Co. v. WatermanWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Hart v. BogleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Forsyth v. New York Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Titus v. Tacoma Smeltermen's Union Local No. 25Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Merritt-Chapman and Scott Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corporation, an Oregon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Boise Cascade Corp. v. PenceWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Brower Co. v. Noise Control of Seattle, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.