Legal Opinion
Lane v. Wahl
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 10, 2000No. 18445-5-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
6 P.3d 621 (2000)
101 Wash.App. 878
Wallace E. LANE and Patricia R. Lane, husband and wife, Respondents,
v.
Thomas E. WAHL and Sharon L. Wahl, husband and wife, Appellants.
No. 18445-5-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Seven.
August 10, 2000.
David J. Carlson, Paul J. Burns, Spokane, for Appellants.
Patrick R. Acres, Robert E. Schiffner, Moses Lake, for Respondents.
SCHULTHEIS, J.
When Wallace and Patricia Lane quitclaimed one and one-half acres of land to their neighbors, they received in return a 10-year renewable lease to continue farming Christmas trees on the property. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Dayton v. Farmers Insurance GroupWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Marassi v. LauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wimberly v. CaravelloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Fagerstrom v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
- Litowitz v. LitowitzWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Wimberly v. CaravelloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- In re the Marriage of LitowitzWashington Supreme Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.