Furman v. Sheppard
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
This appeal from the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County presents the question of whether invasion of privacy claims can be asserted against a trespasser who observes nothing more than what could be seen by persons who were not trespassing. 1 Appellants Irving, Jill, and Sarah Furman (hereinafter referred to as “the Furmans”) present the following question for our review:
Did the Circuit Court err in granting the motion to dismiss for the invasion of privacy claims when an investigator trespassed onto a private club to videotape appellants sailing on their yacht?
Background
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Hollander v. LubowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Harleysville Preferred Ins. Co. v. Rams Head Savage Mill, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Lindenmuth v. McCreerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Williams v. Wicomico County Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Byington v. NBRS Financial BankDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Donastorg v. Daily News Publishing Co.Superior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.