Legal Opinion
Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 14, 1986No. 518, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
Through a declaration and an amended declaration filed in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, appellant charged Bethlehem Steel Corporation and 26 of its employees and agents with intentional infliction of emotional distress, invasion of privacy, interference with appellant’s marriage, and conspiracy. Those torts, appellant averred, arose from the following circumstances: (1) appellant was employed as the business agent of Local 24, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America (Local 24); (2) in 1967, he had been convicted and sentenced in the Criminal Court…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Taylor v. NationsBank, N.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Batson v. ShiflettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Crosten v. KamaufDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
- Solis v. Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Woodbury v. Victory Van LinesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2017
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.