Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Lubow

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 8, 1976No. [No. 107, September Term, 1975.]PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We shall here hold that seeking and obtaining information as to the fact that an individual was a partner in a firm under the circumstances of this case does not constitute an invasion of privacy. Accordingly, we shall set aside judgments totaling $106,001.01 obtained by appellee, Ralph Lubow (Lubow), against appellants, Leroy Hoffberger (Hoffberger), Lawrence F. Rodowsky (Rodowsky), and Maryland National Bank (Maryland National), for an alleged invasion of privacy. 1

As the prior opinions of this Court reflect, there has been extensive litigation growing out of Lubow’s former employment by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Melvin v. ReidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Carr v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Merchants Mortgage Co. v. LubowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Schwartz v. Merchants Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  5. Beane v. McMullenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Reuber v. Food Chemical News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  4. Bailer v. Erie Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Furman v. SheppardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API