Forster v. Manchester
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Cohen,
The main issues in this case are whether appellee’s conduct constitutes an unwarranted invasion of privacy or, alternatively, whether appellee intentionally inflicted severe emotional distress under §46 of the Restatement of Torts.
On July 30,1960, plaintiff-appellant, Isobel Forster, was involved in an automobile accident with one Francis Martin. Counsel for appellant notified Martin’s insurance carrier, the Guardian Mutual Insurance Company (Guardian), and the Hays Adjustment Bureau (Hays), an independent adjustment bureau retained by Guardian, of his…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hull v. Curtis Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Aquino v. Bulletin Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Souder v. Pendleton DetectivesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
3Cited by105 opinions
- Don Chuy, in No. 77-1412 v. The Philadelphia Eagles Football Club (Sued as "The Philadelphia Eagles"), in No. 77-1411 and the National Football LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Harris v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Althaus Ex Rel. Althaus v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.