Legal Opinion

Boyer v. Sowles

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Eaton; Smith, J. Debt by Deloren W. Boyer, administrator of the estate of Peter Boyer, deceased, against Nathaniel Sowles as principal, and Caleb Wolpert and Lucius H. Wilcox as sureties, upon an appeal bond. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action on a bond which reads as follows:

“Know all men by these presents, that Nathaniel Sowles, as principal, and Caleb Wolpert and Lucius H. Wilcox, as sureties, are held and firmly bound unto Peter Boyer in the sum of four thousand dollars, lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid to the said Peter Boyer, or to his certain attorney, heirs, executors, and administrators or assigns, to which payment, well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, heirs, executors, and administrators, and each and every of them, firmly by these presents.
“Sealed with our seals, dated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Healy v. NewtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sowles v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Robson v. DaytonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hollenbeck v. BreakeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API