Legal Opinion

Becker v. Johnston

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1967No. Sac. 7799PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This personal injury action arose out of a

collision of automobiles at an intersection. Defendant and cross-complainant Mrs. Johnston appeals from a judgment of nonsuit in favor of cross-defendants Frank Becker and the County of Sacramento.1 We have concluded that the county has successfully established the plan or design immunity found in Government Code section 830.6,2 that the trial court correctly withheld from the jury the issue of Becker’s liability, and that the judgment should be affirmed as to both cross-defendants.

The nonsuit was properly granted only if, disregarding conflicting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Reuther v. ViallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Cabell v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Leliefeld v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Cornette v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cameron v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. De La Rosa v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API