Legal Opinion
Castle Design & Development Co. v. City of Lake Elmo
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 25, 1986No. C7-86-641PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
In this declaratory judgment action, appellant alleges that the City of Lake Elmo’s denial of its application for zoning variances was unreasonable and unconstitutional. The trial court held for the City. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Castle Design & Development Co., Inc., (“Castle”) is a real estate development company. Kenneth Gervais and Gregory Schmit are officers and shareholders of Castle.
Castle owns a lot (the “Castle property”) located on Lake DeMontreville in the City of Lake Elmo, in an area zoned to permit only single family homes. All the lots surrounding the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- VanLandschoot v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Duffy v. Park Terrace Supper Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirschner v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Valley StreamDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Rowell v. Board of Adjustment of City of MoorheadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re the Variance Request of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Myron v. City of PlymouthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Kottschade v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.