Legal Opinion

Kottschade v. City of Rochester

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 19, 1995No. C3-94-2481PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Respondent Franklin P. Kottsehade brought suit against appellant City of Rochester challenging the city’s denial of a series of applications for permission to convey land in the northern tract of his property. The conveyances included land designated on the official city map as right-of-way for future road and highway improvements. Kott-sehade also challenged the city’s conditional approval of his later application to vacate an easement on the southern tract of his property-

The district court granted summary judgment to Kottsehade on his equal protection claims and on his…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  2. James Knight v. Metro Gov't of NashvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. 614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  4. St. Cloud Police Relief Ass'n v. City of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  5. Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API