Kottschade v. City of Rochester
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Respondent Franklin P. Kottsehade brought suit against appellant City of Rochester challenging the city’s denial of a series of applications for permission to convey land in the northern tract of his property. The conveyances included land designated on the official city map as right-of-way for future road and highway improvements. Kott-sehade also challenged the city’s conditional approval of his later application to vacate an easement on the southern tract of his property-
The district court granted summary judgment to Kottsehade on his equal protection claims and on his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Arcadia Development Corp. v. City of BloomingtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- James Knight v. Metro Gov't of NashvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- 614 Co. v. Minneapolis Community Development AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- St. Cloud Police Relief Ass'n v. City of St. CloudCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005