In re Houghton
California Supreme Court
Application for the disbarment of an attorney and counselor of the Supreme Court. The facts are,stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
On the 7th day of January, 1884, this court made an order “ in the matter of the estate of Allen E. Rose, deceased,” wherein (after reciting that William B. Rose, as guardian of the estate of Louis Allen Rose, aged seven years, Lydia Rose, aged three years, and Ethel Rose, aged two years, only heirs of Allen E. Rose, deceased, and as a creditor of the estate of said Rose, had presented a petition for leave to prove a bill of exceptions to be used in this court on an appeal taken by him as such guardian and creditor, from an order made in the Superior Court of Kern County, allowing the account…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Ex parte FinnOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- In re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In Re Bar Association of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Traxler v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.