Legal Opinion

In Re Lake

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 24, 1924No. Crim. No. 1166PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.

This is an application for relief under habeas corpus from a commitment of the petitioner on a judgment finding him guilty of contempt of court. The charges of contempt upon which the commitment was based arose out of the action of the petitioner in filing and presenting to the court in open session a certain 'affidavit charging the judge of the trial court with bias and prejudice in respect to the defendants in an action then pending before the court. That action was entitled Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. Fannie D. Lake, F. W. Lake, A. F. Lake and E. D. Lake, and was an action in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Schwarz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. McClatchy v. Superior Court of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In Re McCartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. In Re LyonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. King v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API