United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JON 0. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge:
When this case was before us on a prior appeal, we ruled that a criminal contempt fine could not be imposed in an amount greater than $100,000 in the absence of a jury trial. See United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 882 F.2d 656 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 110 S.Ct. 722, 107 L.Ed.2d 741 (1990). Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (“Fox”) now brings a second appeal in an effort to persuade us that it was improperly assessed costs of prosecution. Fox appeals from that portion of the July 11, 1990, judgment of the District Court for the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and Leila J. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fonar Corp. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Chevron Corporation v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Sylvester A. ZiebarthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993