Legal Opinion
Fonar Corp. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 17, 1997No. 837, Docket 95-7847PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
I
Laurence Shiff, attorney for plaintiff Fonar Corporation, appeals from the August 3, 1995 order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Motley, J.), which sanctioned him and Fonar pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37 for their willful violation of the district court’s discovery order. We affirm. The underlying action which gave rise to this appeal is the litigation between Fonar and the defendants-appellees Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc. (“MR Plus”) and Robert Domenick for unfair competition and copyright infringement.
Fonar manufactures magnetic resonance imaging…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harris O. Schoenberg v. Shapolsky Publishers, Incorporated, Ian Shapolsky and Steimatzky Publishing of North America, Inc., Samuel A. Abady, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Thomas E. Hoar, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. Sara Lee Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Sieck v. RussoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Moncrief v. Wyoming State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Huebner v. Midland Credit Mgmt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Reilly v. NatWest Markets Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Reilly v. Natwest Markets Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Selletti v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Selletti v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.