Legal Opinion
Fonar Corporation v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 17, 1997No. 837Published
1Opinion of the Court
128 F.3d 99
38 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1184, 44 U.S.P.Q.2d 1530
FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant,
Laurence Shiff, Appellant,
v.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC. and Robert Domenick,
Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.
No. 837, Docket 95-7847.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 30, 1997.
Decided Oct. 17, 1997.
Laurence Shiff, Shiff & Tisman, New York City, (Stephen E. Tisman, Valerie D. Ringel, Shiff & Tisman, New York City, of counsel), for Appellant.
Ronald S. Katz, Janet Arnold Hart, Coudert Brothers, San Francisco, CA, (Lateef Mtima, Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg &…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spallone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harris O. Schoenberg v. Shapolsky Publishers, Incorporated, Ian Shapolsky and Steimatzky Publishing of North America, Inc., Samuel A. Abady, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Thomas E. Hoar, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. Sara Lee Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. City of YonkersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Sieck v. RussoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.