Lobo Exploration Co. v. Amoco Production Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
CAROL M. HANSEN, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellee, Lobo Exploration Company (Lobo), sued DefendantyAppellant, Amoco Production Company (Amoco), alleging Amoco double-billed certain costs for oil and gas wells where Lobo was a working interest owner and Amoco the operator. Lobo moved to certify the matter as a class action. After a seven-day evidentiary hearing, the trial court issued an order certifying the class. The class was defined as follows:
All persons or entities who own or owned an interest in any drilling and spacing unit, secondary recovery unit, or other…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Layne Christensen Co. v. Zurich CanadaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.