Legal Opinion

Lobo Exploration Co. v. Amoco Production Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 28, 1999No. 91,757PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

CAROL M. HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 Plaintiff/Appellee, Lobo Exploration Company (Lobo), sued DefendantyAppellant, Amoco Production Company (Amoco), alleging Amoco double-billed certain costs for oil and gas wells where Lobo was a working interest owner and Amoco the operator. Lobo moved to certify the matter as a class action. After a seven-day evidentiary hearing, the trial court issued an order certifying the class. The class was defined as follows:

All persons or entities who own or owned an interest in any drilling and spacing unit, secondary recovery unit, or other…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
  5. Layne Christensen Co. v. Zurich CanadaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API