Legal Opinion
Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 25, 2003No. 97,469PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.
T1 This opinion reviews the trial court's determination that this dispute meets the requirements for a class action found at Title 12, section 20283, of the Oklahoma Statutes. The class certification order is affirmed as to the warranty claims asserted but is reversed as to the claim for fraud and deceit.
[ 2 Defendant, DaimlerChrysler, is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Michigan. It manufactured over one million 1996 and 1997 model "minivans" equipped with front passenger seat air bags. Plaintiffs, each an owner of one of the minivans, have asserted Uniform…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Armstrong v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- William ALPERN and Russell D. Miller, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. UTILICORP UNITED, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Harvell v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Masquat v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Burgess v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Bernal v. Charter County Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Speed v. JMA Energy Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.