Layne Christensen Co. v. Zurich Canada
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Beier, J.:
This appeal arises out of a truck accident in California which injured a 6-year-old. We must determine whether the primaiy insurance policy’s coverage limit was stated in Canadian or United States dollars, and, if Canadian, whether either or both of two other policies come into play.
Rehance National Indemnity Company appeals from the district court’s judgment (1) that the coverage limit was stated in Canadian dollars and thus Zurich Canada’s insurance policy did not provide full coverage for the insureds’ $2 million loss; (2) that Reliance’s policy provided secondary coverage; and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hughes Wood Products, Inc. v. WagnerTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Babe Houser Motor Co. v. TetreaultSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Wilkinson v. Shoney's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- Brenner v. Oppenheimer & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Moses v. HalsteadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Park University Enterprises, Inc. v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PADistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.