Legal Opinion

Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 14, 2004No. 90,039PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Plaintiffs Audie Dragon and John Howard are Georgia residents who filed suit on behalf of themselves and a nationwide class of property owners whose property contains polybutylene pipe manufactured from Mitsui resin. Plaintiffs allege this defective product, known as M pipe, was designed, manufactured, advertised, or sold by defendants.

The district court granted plaintiffs’ motion for nationwide class certification and defined the class as: “All persons and entities that own real property or structures and/or improvements to real property in the United…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In re K.M.H.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. State v. EdgarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. Kansas Department of Revenue v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  4. O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  5. In the Interest of J.D.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API