Legal Opinion
Audio Devices, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 2, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUGARMAN, District Judge.
The defendant Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company (Minnesota) moves for an order staying plaintiff Audio Devices, Inc. (Audio) from the further prosecution of this action brought by Audio on June 8, 1955 against Minnesota and Armour Research Foundation of Illinois Institute of Technology (Armour) for a declaratory judgment that Camras pat. No. 2,694,656 be declared invalid and unenforceable and for appropriate injunctive relief (wherein by amended complaint, filed September 2, 1955, Audio avers that Armour is not subject to the jurisdiction of this court),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Cresta Blanca Wine Co. v. Eastern Wine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Bechik Products, Inc. v. Flexible Products, Inc., a Corporation, and Morris Goldstein, Max Goldstein and Leo Goldstein, D/B/A Crown Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Montro Corp. v. PrindleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- International Nickel Co. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kistler Instrumente A. G. v. Pcb Piezotronics, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1976
- Ostow & Jacobs, Inc. v. Morgan-Jones, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960