Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. List v. County of Douglas
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1974No. 7683PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, C. J.:
This original proceeding, commenced by the Attorney General on behalf of the people of the State of Nevada, seeks a writ of mandate to compel Douglas County to pay its apportioned share of expenses to the Tahoe Regional Planning Ageñcy in order that the Agency may be assisted in carrying out its purposes and activities.
The States of Nevada and California entered into the Tahoe Regional Planning Compact which the Congress of the United States has approved. 83 Stats. 360. The findings and declarations of policy are specified in Article I of the Compact (NRS…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hunter v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hadley v. Junior College District of Metropolitan Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Sailors v. Board of Ed. of Kent Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Laakonen v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Eastern v. CantyIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Kussman v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Masto v. Gypsum Resources, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.