Legal Opinion

Sheriff, Clark County v. Provenza

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1981No. 12572PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Appellant Sheriff of Clark County has appealed from a district court order granting respondent Provenza’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

In granting the writ, the district judge found that there was insufficient evidence to establish probable cause to hold Provenza for trial. On this appeal, which was scheduled for oral argument at the request of the Clark County District Attorney pursuant to NRAP 34(f)(3), we are asked by the state to review the record and make an independent determination as to the sufficiency of the evidence.

NRS 34.380 permits the state to appeal from a…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gary v. SheriffNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Konstantinidis v. Sheriff, Clark CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Sheriff, Clark County v. HornerNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In re EasthamNevada Supreme Court · 1980

4Cited by27 opinions

  1. Round Hill General Improvement District v. NewmanNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Sheriff v. BurchamNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Sheriff, Humboldt County v. LangNevada Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Sheriff, Clark County v. BlaskoNevada Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Sheriff, Washoe County v. MileyNevada Supreme Court · 1983

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API