Legal Opinion

Epperson v. Roloff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1986No. 15900PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an action for breach of contract, fraud and rescission arising out of the sale of a home in Incline Village, Nevada. The district court awarded summary judgment to respondents, the defendants below. This appeal followed. Because appellants have apparently abandoned their rescission claim, we affirm the judgment to that extent. With respect to the other claims, however, material issues of fact remain to be tried, and summary judgment was therefore improper. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment and remand the matter for trial.

I. The Facts

In evaluating the propriety of a summary…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bagdasarian v. GragnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rothstein v. Janss Investment Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Lubbe v. BarbaNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  4. American Trust Co. v. California Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Herzog v. Capital Co.California Supreme Court · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by29 opinions

  1. Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. W.W. Vincent & Co. v. First Colony Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. Dow Chemical Co. v. MahlumNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  4. MacKintosh v. Jack Matthews and Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Nevada Power Co. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API